I can't make a utility function like this, nor can you, nor can humanity. This is too detached from the reality of AI development to be useful. This initial dynamic would be used to generate the AI's utility function." It would recursively iterate this prediction for humanity as a whole, and determine the desires which converge. "In calculating CEV, an AI would predict what an idealized version of us would want, "if we knew more, thought faster, were more the people we wished we were, had grown up farther together". Picking on some of the more obviously inane ideas that have come out of it, like Roko's Basilisk, is too easy, but the page you linked is a great example of the problem. I'm familiar with the Yudkowsky school of thought here it's largely where my complaint about basing philosophy off of sci-fi stories comes from. Provides some interesting context to the fact that Elon left the company's board in February 2018 over "disagreements about the company's development." Today this includes publishing most of our AI research, but we expect that safety and security concerns will reduce our traditional publishing in the future, while increasing the importance of sharing safety, policy, and standards research." "We are committed to providing public goods that help society navigate the path to AGI. Therefore, if a value-aligned, safety-conscious project comes close to building AGI before we do, we commit to stop competing with and start assisting this project." "We are concerned about late-stage AGI development becoming a competitive race without time for adequate safety precautions. We’ll freely collaborate with others across many institutions and expect to work with companies to research and deploy new technologies." Researchers will be strongly encouraged to publish their work, whether as papers, blog posts, or code, and our patents (if any) will be shared with the world. (2015) OpenAI's original "Introducing OpenAI Post" : : "As a non-profit, our aim is to build value for everyone rather than shareholders. Wow, I was about to argue against this 'unfairly cynical' take, but it's completely correct. How could it take so long to fix such a serious error?) You have this incredible tool everyone is so excited to use that they're producing hundred-page documents on how to get better results out of it, and somehow none of that actually makes it into the product? what? Outpainting? (And for months, DALL-E had an issue where clicking on any image on the homepage would instantly consume a token. They're also super responsive to their communtiy. Midjourney has cranked out a number of different models, including an extremely exciting new model ("-testp"), new upscaling features, improved facial features, and a bunch more. This is a step in the right direction, but I feel that it is too little, too late. Midjourney has a much better scheme (and unlimited at only 30/month!), and, of course, Stable Diffusion is free. DALL-E makes you think about how much money you're losing continuously - a truly awful choice for a creative tool! Imagine if you had to pay photoshop a cent every time you made a brushstroke. And you didn't have to wait in a long waitlist in order to gain access! They effectively gave these tools free exposure by not allowing people to use DALL-E.įurthermore, the pricing model is much worse for DALL-E than any of its competitors. In the months since then, both Midjourney and Stable Diffusion emerged and got to the point where they produce images of equal or better quality than DALL-E. When it was launched, it was a truly amazing service that had no equal. It's really amazing how DALL-E missed the boat.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |